<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Gentner, Dedre</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Bowdle, Brian F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wolff, Phillip</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Boronat, Consuelo</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
		<SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Gentner, Dedre</SECONDARY_AUTHOR>
		<SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Holyoak, Keith J.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR>
		<SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Kokinov, Boicho N.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR>
	</SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>The analogical mind: perspectives from cognitive science</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Cambridge, Mass.; London</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<PUBLISHER>MIT Press</PUBLISHER>
	<PAGES>199-253</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Cognitive</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Linguistics</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<NOTES>"surprisingly little is known about how metaphors are psychologically processed" p. 199Metaphor can be modeled as inter-domain mappings for novel but not for conventional metaphors which can be better captured by models from analogy.They propose a theory 'the career of metaphor'"how metaphoric representation changes as a metaphor evolves from novel to conventional."Describe types of theories: localist vs. domain-mapping (incl. some problems with Lakoff's strong invariance claims)Possibilities of domain mapping:-projective mapping (creates new meaning)-structural parallelism (metaphors reflect parallel semantic domain)-cognitive archeology (systematic metaphors are mapped as large-scale conceptual systems)-local lexical relations (simple polysemies adn homphonies) <-- weakest theory</NOTES>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>